Government Printers Wrap up Virginia Beach Conference

U.S. Public Printer Bill Boarman addresses the NGPA conference.

Lise Melton (right) swears in new NGPA officers, from left: Mike Lincoln (Colorado), Dan Brush (Vermont), Timothy Smith (Wisconsin), John Wright (Alaska), Susie Barthel (Louisiana) and Doug Beckham (Mississippi).

Kevin Field, Richard Beto and Greg Cholmondeley.

John Wright, from Alaska's Legislative Affairs Agency Print Shop, Consultant Vic Barkin and Doug Beckham, of Mississippi Joint Legislative Printing.

In the NGPA vendor area

Though the National Government Publishing Association conference got off to an awkward start, U.S. Public Printer William Boarman turned things completely around once he took the stage.

When the National Government Publishing Association (NGPA) convened in Virginia Beach recently, long-time attendees like Andy Sherman, of the Government Printing Office, and Susie Barthel, of Louisiana’s Office of State Printing, were joined by a number of first-time attendees, such as Timothy Smith, of the State of Wisconsin, and Mike Lincoln, of Colorado Central Services. Despite a low turnout overall, attendees were reportedly very enthusiastic and shared lots of information.

Though the event got off to an awkward start, things turned completely around after the keynote speech. After being welcomed by NGPA President Lise Melton, of the Iowa Department of Administrative Services, attendees listened to an address by Virginia Beach Deputy City Manager Dave Hansen. Though he was supposed to simply welcome the group to his city, in an unexpected and ironic twist, Hansen talked about how the budget for printing had been cut in Virginia Beach due to declining demand, resulting in cuts to the printing staff—not exactly a strong message to kick off an in-plant printers’ conference.

Fortunately, things turned around quickly when U.S. Public Printer William J. Boarman took the stage for his keynote address, demonstrating why he is known as “the first printer.” Boarman explained why many people make incorrect assumptions about the costs associated with in-plants.

“I think that is a common misconception and a false positive by managers who get rid of print shops. They think that by moving a line item that is very visible, they will save money. Someone in city council can look at this and say, ‘There’s $1.5 million that we can save,’ but they don’t know how much they are going to save in the long run.

“Often they lose track of the expense because it is broken out and into small numbers across multiple jobs and multiple vendors, and may take years before anyone realizes that the older way was the cheaper way to do it. To me this is false positive, and at the expense of some really good city, state and national workers.”

Related story: Government Printers Meet in New Orleans

Bob has served as editor of In-plant Graphics since October of 1994. Prior to that he served for three years as managing editor of Printing Impressions, a commercial printing publication. Mr. Neubauer is very active in the U.S. in-plant industry. He attends all the major in-plant conferences and has visited more than 130 in-plant operations around the world. He has given presentations to numerous in-plant groups in the U.S., Canada and Australia, including the Association of College and University Printers and the In-plant Printing and Mailing Association. He also coordinates the annual In-Print contest, cosponsored by IPMA and In-plant Graphics.

Related Content